I have to wonder, is Mr. Rall talking about a revolution where the people of the United States rise up against our the American form of Government or that the left rise up against the right. The people rising up against the American form of Government is not likely to happen. The progressives in this country think they have more of a force then they really have. In the show, Ratigan asks, “Are things in our country so bad that it might actually be time for revolution?  Of course, the answer is yes, and it requires “violence or at least the threat thereof,”

Remember this is the same leftist that would give up his freedom of speech because of some angry Muslims.  First I have to say, how many of you on the right are really afraid of violence of the left? The threat of violence on the left is more talk than action. The left that requires kids to wear helmets while riding bikes and sensitive men smoking pipes in their tweed jackets and thinks that hunting deer is barbaric.  Does Mr. Rall think that is an ideology revolution. because that is what it would be, Left vrs Right, that the left would even have a chance of winning a violent revolution?

What does he think the militia patriot groups are? They are almost all on the right. These are groups that train for the day, the leftist take up arms against America. Would I fight alongside the American Nazi party? No way in hell. I would more likely fire on them. They belong on the left because they are also groups that want to bring down the American system and have no regard for the American constitution.  Leftist, you can have them. Don’t get me wrong, I don’t make the mistake of underestimating my enemy. I know the left have some military groups like the New Black Panther Party that would be a military force worth paying attention to as well as maybe the Weather Underground, if most of their members are not 70 year old hippies left from the 1960′s.

But the average Mr. Joe Blow leftist? Most of them would not want to even hold a gun let alone fire one. This is the same left that is trying to pussify professional football and would rather have their sons play soccer then American football or hockey. The pussification of America has been instigated by the left not the right. In the mean time, men and women on the right teach their kids how to shoot and hunt and play football and hockey. Only in places where there are actual law against kids riding bikes without helmets do we make our kids wear helmets. My son who now is 30, knew how to field strip a .45 cal hand gun by the time he was 10.  How many kids of leftist parents even handled a gun let alone field striped one.

Me personally I would have problems firing on fellow Americans, but if our very way of life is in danger and the left took to arms against other Americans, I would do want is necessary.  Most leftist think they can take over the country using the political system. The November 2010 midterm elections showed them that we on the right can fight back in the ballot box as well as on the battle field. Mr. Rall is one of those leftist that if you shoot him in the leg he will give up and give up all his family and friends. In other words Mr. Rall is a coward. He talks about revolution but it is my guess that he would be too much of a pussy to participate in actual fighting and I suspect most on the left are cut from the same cloth.

If America fails, it will be because of the progressives, Marxist, statist, liberals, socialist or communist. Call them what you like, they are all on the left.  It was the right that built this country into the greatest country the world has ever seen. It will be the poison of the left that will bring this country down and it has been going on for almost 100 years since the progressives first showed up in this country. But they have to do it slowly until the people do not realize their freedoms are gone, like the frog in hot water because the kind of America that they want is not a better America. Capitalism and Americanism can be open because it is a force for good and common sense people are willing to adopt a system that is in the better interest of the individual. Screw groupism, and multiculturalism. The strength of a country is in what is common, not what sets us apart. The left promotes groups, divide and conquer. Former KGB agents of the former soviet union, said they were amazed at how many leftist actually fell for their propaganda that for the most part was made up in some Soviet government building with no historical facts what so ever. They were as the Soviet leader Stalin said “Useful idiots.”

Who would win in a fighting revolution of ideologies? I suppose that would depend allot on whose side the government took and would commit the military forces to. The government and military staying out of it there would be no questions the left would lose with big losses. They might have a chance if the military was fighting by their side but then you have to ask, how many in the military would follow a leftist ideology that was in direct violation of the U.S. Constitution. The right is committed to supporting and defending the constitution, the left wants to destroy it to fit their own selfish needs.  It is not a likely scenario that the government would stay out of a civil fight nor is it likely that many military personnel would follow them. There would probably be fighting within the government as to whose side to take, but I guess that would depend on what party was in office. But if history of Vietnam and the Gulf wars are any indication. The left would be clamoring and holding protest to stop the war even in the unlikely scenario the left was winning. They could announce a draw down date and we on the right would just have to hold out until the drawdown.

No Mr. Rall we on the right are not worried about a threat of violence from you or your ilk, but be warned, we are ready and training if you ever do try take up arms and hurt Americans. We will fight to the death to protect our country the way is has been and always intended to be, not your way. I doubt very much you would be willing to die and give up everything for what you believe. You have already shown that with your remarks concerning the “Everybody Draw Muhammad Day” campaign. You worry more about your security then your freedom of speech. People like you do not deserve the freedoms you do have.  If I had the ability to draw there would be tens of thousands of cartoons of Muhammad on the internet with my name on them to show that freedom of speech is still alive and well in America and the childish ravings of some in this would does not deter everyone. Only the cowards like you.

What is the sheepdog concept? Well basically, the sheepdog concept is that there are three kinds of people in the world. The sheep that consist of average people that are good kind people and have no desire to cause harm to any other human being unless by accident or self-defense, the wolves that consist of aggressive people who are sociopaths and have no love for humanity, only care about themselves and cause harm to others, and the sheepdogs. Also aggressive people who have a deep love of humanity and see themselves as protectors of the flock. Sheepdogs would be the police, military, firemen and all first responders that put their lives on the line to protect others from the wolves. But it is not just the first responders it is also the modern constitutional militia men and women who also would put their lives on the line to protect and save others. As for politicians, the jury is still out on whether they are wolves or sheepdogs. I think in most cases they are a little of both and allot of neither, they lookout for themselves and their party more than the people.

The sheepdog concept was first brought about from the book, On Combat, by Lt. Col. Dave Grossman, in it he talks about the difference between the sheepdogs, the wolves and the sheep. There is a good article about the sheepdog concept on the website: http://www.killology.com/sheep_dog.htm . I am not going to quote this entire article because it is too long for this blog post but I will high light some parts of it. For a more in-depth view of the sheepdog concept go to the website I listed above or read Lt. Col. Dave Grossmans book “On Combat”.

The sheep sometimes look down on the sheepdogs. Sometimes they see the sheepdogs as being just as evil as the wolf and think they can live their lives without the sheepdogs. The people are in denial that the wolf even exists or they think for some unknown reason they are immune from the wolves’ bite. An example would be the elitist that run the San Francisco city government. They have stated publicly that the military is not needed and any and all problems can be handled by the police who by the way, work for the city government. They are in denial that any situation would come up that the police or the fire department could not handle. Of course they could not run a city without the sheepdogs of the police and fire department. They only want the sheep dogs they think they can control.

Lt. Col. Grossman said it best in his book; “We know that the sheep live in denial; that is what makes them sheep. They do not want to believe that there is evil in the world. They can accept the fact that fires can happen, which is why they want fire extinguishers, fire sprinklers, fire alarms and fire exits throughout their kids’ schools. But many of them are outraged at the idea of putting an armed police officer in their kid’s school. Our children are dozens of times more likely to be killed, and thousands of times more likely to be seriously injured, by school violence than by school fires, but the sheep’s only response to the possibility of violence is denial. The idea of someone coming to kill or harm their children is just too hard, so they choose the path of denial.”

“The sheep generally do not like the sheepdog. He looks a lot like the wolf. He has fangs and the capacity for violence. The difference, though, is that the sheepdog must not, cannot and will not ever harm the sheep. Any sheepdog that intentionally harms the lowliest little lamb will be punished and removed. The world cannot work any other way, at least not in a representative democracy or a republic such as ours.”

“Still, the sheepdog disturbs the sheep. He is a constant reminder that there are wolves in the land. They would prefer that he didn’t tell them where to go, or give them traffic tickets, or stand at the ready in our airports in camouflage fatigues holding an M-16. The sheep would much rather have the sheepdog cash in his fangs, spray paint himself white, and go, “Baa.”"

“Until the wolf shows up. Then the entire flock tries desperately to hide behind one lonely sheepdog. As Kipling said in his poem about “Tommy” the British soldier:

The sheep never want the sheep dog until they are needed, the left denies they are needed even when they are demonize the sheepdogs to the point of hate. The best example was in the 1960′s with the anti-war protesters, the biggest deniers of the 1960′s and they demonized all forms of sheepdogs not just military. Police were pigs; military returning from the Vietnam War were spat upon and called baby killers, and politicians were seen as evil greedy men. Today we all see politicians as evil greedy men and women but witch party is evil depends on witch party you support. If you have no party or are independent you probably see both sides of the current political parties as evil and greedy. To be honest the independents are probably closer to the truth. No one wants to believe they support an evil party but greed and lust for power is a human condition and politicians are only human, no matter what they tell you and yes that includes Obama.

The leftist of the 1960′s made denial mainstream. Anyone who fought for peace or worked to preserve peace was seen as evil rather then what they were, heroes doing the job the left denied even existed. The left made the world think evil didn’t exist, just misunderstood people, that is, unless you were opposed to the leftist ideas, then you were evil. To the left anyone that disagreed with their ideology is evil. But back then it was much more subtle and was left to the anti-war, anti-capitalist hate groups. In modern times it is in mainstream news. Because of the surge of patriotism after the 9/11 attacks the left could not go about demonizing the military that would put too many American against them, so they demonize people and things associated with the war. Our previous president was the biggest target, once again by the sheep denying the wolf at our door. Recently the sheep have turned their attentions to the Tea Party and legal constitutional militias. I am not going to debate the relevance of the Tea Party and why the left is wrong about them that is for another time.

One of the most obvious moves of the left in this country is to find something on the right to demonize and lump everything even remotely associated with it into one group and never let up. One of the reason I mentioned the Tea Party and the constitutional militias is because the left that run the left stream media lump the Tea Party and the militias into one group. One group has nothing to do with the other. Tea Partiers and militia groups may have the same ideas about America and some militia member’s maybe Tea Partiers. But the Tea Party is about peaceful change at the ballot box, so of course the left has to demonize them because it means change from the leftist agenda. The militias are not about change, they are about defending what has existed for over 230 years. The constitutional militias will only go into action if they are needed to preserve what America has already built. The militias are about training for a time that may never come. And to be honest, most if not all militia members hope that time never comes. To a militia member is it enough to know they are prepared should the worst possible scenario ever happen.

The left stream media wants you to believe that the constitutional militias are not only morally wrong they are illegal. This could not be father from the truth in both cases. As for morality, the militias see it as immoral to have bad things happen and not at least try to stop it. In the case of the militias as a last resort it would be immoral to allow the evil to transform America in to a country it was never meant to be and it would also be immoral to not protect the constitution from those that want to destroy it or change it to a document that no longer protects our rights. As for the legality of the constitutional militia it can be found in US Code Title 10.

The Constitutional Militias

Militia are legal and constitutional, according to US Code Title 10, Subtitle A, Part I, Chapter 13, Subsection 311:

Subsection 311; Composition and classes

1. The militia of the United States consists of all able bodied males between the ages of 17 and 45 who are citizens of the United States and not actively serving in the Armed Forces and women in the National Guard.
2. The classes of the militia are –
3. The organized militia consisting of the National Guard and the Naval Militia and
4. The unorganized militia which consist of members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or Naval Militia or active duty military.

The modern constitutional militia would be the unorganized militia who is not funded by any taxpayer’s money and who are armed by their own means and the means of the second amendment of the constitution. Notice that all able bodied males between the ages of 17 and 45 are part of a militia. If the law was enforced, anyone not in a militia unless they had a wavier would be breaking the law.

Most people do not realize there are many more militia groups in this country then the media is either willing to tell the public about or doesn’t know about. I have a feeling it is more not willing to tell the public. Remember, in all media, electronic and print, they tell you only what they want you to see or hear. If you only believe what the media tells you without researching for yourself then you are seriously uninformed.

Every state in the union, including Alaska and Hawaii has one or more militia groups. For most states, there are several groups to cover the whole state and new groups popping up all the time. Now for most people when they hear the word militia the first thing they think of is white sheets, or Nazi flags or extreme Christian groups or Tim McVeigh and the Oklahoma City bombing. This is because it is what the media and the government wants you to think about. They don’t want you to think about the men that won our independence from the English were militia men or that according to US Code the unorganized militias are a legal entity. And they especially don’t want you to know that the unorganized militia is what the founding fathers had in mind to keep our government from overextending their authority. From what I see in Washington right now, the constitutional unorganized militia is likely the only organization that is willing to fight for our rights other then lawsuits and talk. The government does not control our budget nor do they control the forces. The modern constitutional militia swears and oath to the constitution and not anyone in the government including the president.

The media says Tim McVeigh who bombed the federal building in Oklahoma City was tied to militia groups. Of course you notice they never say which one, because the truth is he may have been in a militia group at one time but was not part of the militia movement when he committed his evil deed, he probably was kick out because of his evil ideas. As a matter of fact I think if he would have been part of a real constitutional militia, he would have been kicked out, stopped before it ever happened and turned in, or not have wanted to. No real militia would have allowed that to happen if they could have prevented it. He had more association with the regular military then the militias.

I have to admit, that in at least one report, CNN did a report on a militia group that was not negative. It was pretty neutral as a matter of fact but then that is the way reporting is supposed to be. But reports like that are few and far between. Most reports about any militia groups paint a picture of gun nut, right wing zealots and racist who are just looking for a fight and want to blame all their problems on the government or some other race or religion. That is the picture we see because that is what they want us to see. I decided to check it out for myself.

First I want to say that yes there are some extremist paramilitary racist groups out there, and most of the time they are the ones the news reports on and lumps all militia groups together, but they are not a part of the constitutional militia movement that is ever growing all over the country. What is the difference you say? It is very simple, the extreme paramilitary racist groups like the KKK, the American Nazi Party and the New Black Panthers, who are on the extreme left end of the political spectrum as opposed to the others that are on the extreme right end but have the same idea, that is the use of force and violence to promote their extreme racist and radical ideologies.

The constitutional militias on the other hand are people that have a deep and defining love of country, the people and the constitution of the United States. These groups are not anti-government, or racist or anti-American. They are anti-multiculturalism, which is just a form of institutionalized racism. America was based on the idea of many people coming together to form one country. E pluribus Unum; out of many one, Multiculturalism is out of one, many, Multiculturalism serves to divide our country, it does not bring us together it splits up apart by groups. Constitutional Militias love our constitutional system of government and want to see it stay that way. A system of government based on the laws of the constitution. As for being racist, there are black people that are in some militias but I bet there is not a single white person or non black person in the Black Panthers. Most if not all of the militia groups would welcome any black man or woman that wants to be a member as long as they believed in what the militia stands for, the constitution and individual freedom. I would say that militia members are more patriotic then most American because they are willing to fight for America and give up their very lives as most Americans are not. Militias are also gender neutral and have many women as militia members. Most but not all, militia members are former military that take their oath to the constitution very seriously and require others that are not former military to take the same oath. These men and women see themselves as the sheepdogs of America, just the same as the police and military. The constitutional militias understand that someday they may be needed. Most if not all hope that day never comes, because if it does that means the America as we know it will be gone. But if they are needed they want to be ready for the day because they will not let America or the constitution go down without a fight.

The original militia of the continental army was people like us, farmers and blacksmiths and businessmen and freed slaves that had never fought before and still beat what was at the time the strongest army in the world. The modern constitutional militia constantly trains for the day they may be needed. Most of us hope that day does not ever come, but if it does, isn’t it better to be trained for it then have to train while fighting like the original militia? It may come down to the day that the Army, National Guard, and police are so overwhelmed that they cannot protect every community. That is where the militia comes in; protect our people and communities when the first responders cannot. We do not rely on the government to tell us what to do or what is needed. We already know what we will need to do and what is needed.

I have to think that as long as there are people like the Sheepdogs, I think there will be a check on the Government. The repressive progressives or in other words the left, demonize the people they are afraid of the most. Sara Palin, Rush Limbaugh, all of the conservative talk show hosts, Alex Jones, the Tea Party and of course the militias. The others talk and can do a lot of damage to the repressive progressive agenda when it comes to the vote and that is why the left is trying to bring back the unfairness doctrine to shut them down, but they know we are waiting in the background for the time if and when the vote doesn’t work any longer and it is time to use force to maintain America as it has always been. They are afraid of us because we are not the sheep they need for their agendas to work and we can and will fight back. They cannot stop the militias without bloodshed. The militias grow in ranks as they grow in power and that scares the crap out of them. They also know there are tens of millions of people who feel the same way that are just waiting for that push but choose to be silent in the mean time to see what is going to happen. People like most of the gun owners in America. These are the sheep with sheepdog tendencies. Imagine how much the ranks of the militias would swell if they attempt to ban all guns like the UN wants.

The repressive progressives are evil, but they are not stupid, they also know the harder they push the more the sheepdogs will protect their flock. Look what happened after 9/11, Millions of young people and not so young people swarmed to the military to serve their country and fight the evil. The same things will be happening to the militias as the progressives get more and more power and the one world order people try to get a grip on American politics and laws. More and more people will flock to the militias.

Some people say it is because of Barack Obama’s skin color. These are the people that are race baiters and see racism everywhere even where it does not exist. They want to see racism because it is their only playing card in a game they cannot win. The truth is even if John McCain would have won the election and had the same Marxist agenda as Obama, nothing would have changed. There still would have been millions of people buying guns, The Tea Parties would have been just as active and the militias would still have grown in ranks. It is Obama’s leftist ideology that drives all this, not the color of his skin. If he was white the same thing would have happened. The fact is America is a center right country and when the left pushes, we push back. We also feel the same about the Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and Senator Harry Reid and they are about as white bread as you can get but they share the same ideology as Obama. Race baiting is the tool of an immature mind that cannot compete in the war of ideologies on an adult level.

As for the modern constitutional militias, the American people need not fear. These are your neighbors willing to give their lives to protect you and your property from any invader. The militias do not want to change the government by force but by the vote. The repressive progressives think racism is what drives the militias when the truth is it is the ideology of the leftist repressive progressives that drive the militias. If they did not exist, there would be no need for an armed civilian constitutional militia. The more power the leftist, Marxist, progressives get the harder the militias train because they know the more power the left gets the more power they will take until it is to the point of totalitarianism and throwing the constitution out the window, and that the patriots of the militias are not about to let happen.

I don’t know what Ann told him and to be honest I don’t care, so I thought I would give it a shot an tell him what I think we as a country have to do to make the Muslim extremist like us.

Well Chris, you don’t mind if I call you Chris do you? Calling you Mr. Matthews would be so degrading. Well Chris, there are many things we can do as a country to appease our Muslim friends. The very first thing we would have to do is pull every American solider from every country in the world and not interfere when they try to force their brand of religious slavery on unwilling people. The next thing we would need to do is to disband our entire military as they would like to put in their own black shirts.

We could then denounce our republic and tear up the constitution, especially that silly little amendment that talks about religious freedom and separation of church and state. After all, to a Muslim extremist the church is the state. Freedom of speech will be done with too as well as freedom of the press, we can’t have anyone disagreeing with Islam now can we?

Next I am afraid they would insist on disbanding the congress and Supreme Court and would also insist on installing a Muslim cleric as the supreme leader. The president would probably still be allowed, especially Obama since he is Muslim but would be nothing more than a puppet to the Supreme leader. Kind of like now.

One other thing we might do is get rid of all law enforcement and inelegance agencies and install Sari law as the law of the land. We might want to convert all Americans to Islam and behead those who refuse to. Oh and we also might want to take all gay men and women and perform daily hangings just like they do in Iran. You see Chris, Islam does not tolerate gays being in their society, or Jews or Christians for that matter. Of course we might want to cover our woman up as that is the Islamic way and we want them to be our friends’ right?

We could also burn to the ground every Christian church we see and kill all the evil Christian leaders. Well I think you know what they would want us to do with the Jews in America don’t you. I’ll give you a hint, it involves a mass grave.

So you see Chris, there are many things we can do to make our Muslim friends from across the seas like us, then maybe they would not want to kill us. Of course the republic of the United States of America would be gone, but then you would like that wouldn’t you. The problem is that there would be no more talk of socialism or communism or Marxism ether. You see only Islam and Sari law is the only system of government that will be tolerated in a Muslim society. Oh yea, and people like you of the western press, you would probably be put to the sword just as an example to the others to make sure the press reported only what the Supreme leader wanted reported.

The truth is Chris; we can’t make them like us. The only way is to become them. And that is not likely to happen, not in our lifetime or the next hundred lifetimes.

Fair winds and following seas

I don’t carry a gun because I’m paranoid. I carry a gun because there are real threats in the world.

I don’t carry a gun because I’m evil in the world. I carry a gun because I have lived long enough to see some of the evil in the world.

I don’t carry a gun because I hate the government. I carry a gun because I understand the limitations of government.

I don’t carry a gun because I’m angry. I carry a gun so that I don’t have to spend the rest of my life being angry at myself for failing to be prepared.

I don’t carry a gun because I want to shoot someone. I carry a gun because I want to live to an ripe old age and die in my bed and not on a sidewalk somewhere tomorrow afternoon.

I don’t carry a gun because I want to feel like a cowboy. I carry a gun because should I be illegally attacked, I want to be a cowboy.

I don’t carry a gun to make me feel like a man. I carry a gun because men know how to protect themselves and the ones they love.

I don’t carry a gun because I feel inadequate. I carry a gun because unarmed and facing three armed thugs, I am inadequate.

I don’t carry a gun because I love it. I carry a gun because I love life and the people who make it meaningful to me.

Police Protection is an oxymoron. Free citizens must protect themselves.

Police do not protect you from crime; they investigate the crime after it happens and then call in someone to clean up the mess.

Personally, I carry a gun because I’m too young to die and too old to take an ass whoopin’.
Author Unknown

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy

I was 12 years old when I watched on that small box the grainy picture of man’s first footsteps on the moon. Those first words spoken on that day, “One small step for man, one giant leap for mankind” still eco in my mind just as fresh as the day they were said 41 years ago. That image inspired me. It inspired me to be the best I could be so one day maybe I would walk in those famous footsteps. I was devastated the day I realized I could never become an astronaut because of my eyes. Back then to even be considered for the space program you had to have 20/20 vision. For most of my life, NASA has been the ultimate in space and technology. To work at NASA you had to be what I would consider a genius. The ultimate of the scientific world was a rocket scientist.

That moon landing not only inspired me, it inspired millions or kids all over America, it make Americans feel good about our country and made us realize after all the problems of the 1060′s we were still a great country. In the 1960′s we had the LA riots, the assignations of both President Kennedy, and his brother and Dr. Martin Luther King. We had Vietnam that was made even worse by groups of (and I use the term loosely) Americans protesting the war. We had the Kent State massacre that was initiated by the same groups of people who protested the war. We had soldiers being spit on when they came home, we had the Marxist movement gaining ground and poisoning the minds of young people and then we had the moon landing. The moon landing made us forget, at least for awhile the problems our country was facing.

Do you remember the movie, Armageddon? At the end of the movie after Bruce Willis blew up the asteroid that threatens to destroy earth the world rejoiced, in America every one flied flags, kids built rocket ships to look like the shuttles in the movie and pretended to be the men that just saved the world. For those of you that never saw the movie, remember how America banded together after 9/11? That is what it was like in America on that July day in 1969. America was proud again.

After that, American relived that pride every time we went back to the moon and flew the first shuttle flight and docked with the first space station. American believed that the final frontier was about to be explored and America with it ingenuity, brilliance and ability to create the wealth to fund a space exploration program would be at the forefront. America had the best of the best, the best scientist, the best astronauts, the best rockets and the best agency to put all of it together. It was agencies like NASA that actually improved America that I never minded paying taxes to support.

Now our President has effectively killed the space program. He shut down the program to build the next generation of space shuttle, the canceled the planned return to the moon and if we do ever get to Mars it will be in other countries rockets built by them and probably flown by them also. More than likely it would be Russia.

Let’s forget about how many thousands of jobs are now lost because of his shutting down the space program, and let’s forget about how many thousands of jobs that are lost by companies that support NASA and the space program. How many patents that make our lives better on a daily basis are by NASA? One is the Microwave; most people today would have a hard time living without their microwave ovens.

So what now is the role of NASA to play in the American life? According to the Chief of NASA our wonderful feel good president has ordered NASA’s primary role to engaging with the Muslim world so they feel good about their contributions to math and science. What contributions? Ok, I will grant the foaming at the mouth liberal reading this that when our European culture was still wearing animal skins and painting their faces to look fierce in battle, the Middle East was a land of culture, and science and math. Of course there were still wars, and they were still killing themselves, but they had culture. That was 400 years ago, what have they brought the world since then besides death and destruction, oh, yea, oil.

Speaking of oil, back in the good old days, when Saudi Arabia was nothing but sand, oil was discovered. Oil so close to the surface you could almost poke a stick in the ground and it would come gushing out. But the Saudis, with their wonderful abilities of math and science were so backward and stuck in the 14^th century they could not figure how to get it out of the ground let alone sell it. Along comes America and built the rigs to get it out of the ground, built the storage facilities to store it and even built the barrels to ship it to the rest of the world.

And here we are in the 21^st century and they are still following a culture that has the Muslim world stuck in the 14^th century. Oh granted, they have not willingly moved themselves forward in history. They even drive motor cars now! They willingly move forward were weapons are concerned. Even there they are 40 years behind the rest of the world. They don’t make their own weapons; they buy and steal from other countries. Except for the Nuclear Bomb, even then most of their top scientists were education in the West, most likely the U.S. or England or France. And the materials they need to make a bomb they have to get from the west, most likely Russia or China.

President Obama has now ordered NASA to dumb it down; this is group and identity politics at its worst. But it seems to be a trademark of the Obama administration. It is embarrassing to the nation and it is busy work for NASA because Obama does not want to kill NASA all together. That would be political suicide, but he does not want to fund the space program any longer. He would rather spend our money on welfare, and social security and health care and cap and trade. He knows none of these programs bring in money and they all contribute greatly to our national debt. Funding the space program is taking money away from his pet projects and increasing taxes to the point that they will pay for all of his welfare programs is more than people would put up with. Even the Democrats would put up a fuss if he increased taxes as much as he would need to pay for his programs and the space program.

This is not going to end with the space program; he has already started to cut the defense budget. The main and number one enumerated role of the federal government is national defense. He cut the program that would build the next generation of fighter jets, he cut the missile defense program to the bone, he ended the European missile defense program in Eastern Europe, and he has cut various defense programs that the liberal left-stream media is not going to tell you about, like education for the soldiers, and health care for veterans. If and when he does pull all the troops out of the Middle East he will cut the D.O.D. to the bone all the while increasing more and more spending on programs the federal government has no business messing with and his austerity programs.

So what has the legacy of Obama been so far, make nice with our enemies, turn your back on our friends, apologize to the world for America that he has no reason to apologize for, continue to play group politics and cut the programs that make America strongest and fund the programs that make us weak. Some day in the future of America, if there is one, they will look at the history books and see the Obama administration as the administration that did everything possible to change reality to fix things rather than real world solutions and had everything backwards. Only a year and a half into his administration and already he is the worse president in history. He has Carter beat by a long shot.

Muhammad cartoonist attacked during lecture

Police use pepper spray, batons to hold off angry crowd

By MALIN RISING

updated 3:04 p.m. ET, Tues., May 11, 2010

STOCKHOLM – A Swedish artist who angered Muslims by depicting the Prophet Muhammad as a dog was assaulted Tuesday as angry protesters interrupted his university lecture about the limits of artistic freedom.

Lars Vilks told The Associated Press a man in the front row ran up to him and head-butted him during the lecture, breaking his glasses but leaving him uninjured. It wasn’t immediately clear what happened to the attacker.

A video clip of the incident on the website of a Swedish newspaper showed police using pepper spray and batons to hold off an angry crowd shouting “God is great” in Arabic after Vilks was escorted out of the lecture hall.

Vilks has faced numerous threats over his controversial drawing of Muhammad with a dog’s body, but Tuesday’s incident was the first time he has been physically assaulted.

Earlier this year U.S. investigators said Vilks was the target of an alleged murder plot involving Colleen LaRose, an American woman who dubbed herself “Jihad Jane,” and who now faces life in prison. She had pleaded not guilty.

Vilks said a group of about 15 people had been shouting and trying to interrupt the lecture before the incident at Uppsala University.

Many of them stormed the front of the room after the attack and clashed with security guards as Vilks was pulled away into a separate room, he said, describing the scene as “complete chaos.”

“A man ran up and threw himself over me. I was head-butted and my glasses were broken,” Vilks said before hanging up for questioning by police.

Uppsala University spokeswoman Pernilla Bjork said Vilks was showing a provocative film with sexual content to the crowd when the attacker ran up and hit him in the face with his fists.

Muslim protests
The video posted on Uppsala Nya Tidning’s site showed agitated police officers clashing with protesters at the front of the lecture hall. A female police officer uses pepper spray to subdue a young man. Another youngster is wrestled to the ground.

Uppsala police spokesman Tommy Karlsson said a man and woman in their 20s were detained on suspicion of using violence against police.

University officials said there had been a peaceful demonstration by Muslims outside the university before Vilks started to speak, and that about 250 people attended his lecture. Bjork said the university had been in contact with police and security guards before Vilks’ lecture to ensure his safety.

“We think it is our task as a university to be able discusses difficult issues,” she said. “We think it is very unfortunate that this has resulted in violence.”

Vilks made his rough sketch more than a year after 12 Danish newspaper cartoons of the prophet sparked furious protests in Muslim countries in 2006.

A Swedish newspaper printed the drawing, leading to further protests, and revived a heated debate in the West and the Muslim world about religious sensitivities and the limits of free speech.

It also led to numerous death threats against Vilks, who was temporarily moved to a secret location after al-Qaida in Iraq put a $100,000 bounty on his head in September 2007.

I am surprised Mr. Vilks is still alive. I imagine there is a fatwa on his head. But our soldiers have killed or captured most of the good Muslim fighters and all that is left is the incompetent ones. So maybe that is why he is still alive.

Let’s see if I get this right. On September 11, 2001 3000 people lost their lives and the leftist media worried about angry Americans taking out their anger on Muslims here at home and it never happened. Then a Muslim fanatic in a US Army uniform went berserk and killed 15 people at Fort Hood and the leftist worried that the American people would take out their anger on the Muslims here and it never happened. Then a would be martyr tried to take down an airliner on Christmas day but failed due to sheer incompetence and the left was worried that the American people would take out their anger on the Muslims here, then another incompetent would be bomber tried to blow up Times Square in New York and only did not because again of sheer incompetence. It is pretty pathetic that the only reason some people are alive is because the would-be killers were total screw ups. The leftist like Contessa Brewer were worried the American people would take out their anger and it never happened. But one cartoonist draws a picture making fun of Mohammad and millions of Muslims around the world commit acts of violence against people and property and the left is silent. They murder people who speak out against Islam and the left is silent. They murder people who convert from Muslim to Christian and the left is silent. They murder soldiers and the only reason the left isn’t silent is to make excuses for him and worry the American people are going to get violent. When it comes to Muslims the left hears not evil, sees no evil, and speaks no evil just like monkeys except when it comes to their own countrymen. They live in a fantasy world where they want the Muslims to be the good guys and all the americans that do not agree with them as the enemy. Sorry people, reality is the exact opposite.

What hypocrites! Why are totally peaceful tax rallies with no signs of racism scorned by the left but a illegal alien rally turn to rock throwing and people arrested and they are mostly peaceful and never once is the violence shown except by members of the press on the right. The leftist in the media have yet to show any video of violence, racism or anything else that would degrade the Tea Parties but some people on the right prove the rallies in Arizona are not peaceful and are racist and they ignore it. Because it is the narrative of the left, that groups that protest left wing causes are always right and groups that protest right wing causes are always wrong. That is right out of the “Rules for radicals” playbook. Not to mention, the leftist Frankfort Schools critical theory.

Critical Theory is to criticize everything on the right and nothing on the left. I despise racism, and if I ever thought the tea parties were racist I would have nothing to do with them. I also despise race batters that claim racism when none exist. Yes I mean you Contessa brewer and you Keith Obermann. I also despise people who make a living off of racism and do everything they can to keep it going so they seem more relevant then they really are. People like Jessie Jackson and Al Sharpton. This isn’t the 60′s anymore. If it was not for just these two people racism may have died out long ago. But the media gives then a podium to spew their hate and it keeps on going. If Dr. King would have lived longer, no one would even know who Jessie Jackson is. It was the death of Dr. King, who I admire greatly, that sent his star rising. If Dr. King were alive today, based on his speeches, I think he would be mad as hell at all the race baiting going on today especially by the leftist media.

The point is, the left are hypocrites when it comes to Muslims and racism in general. Tea parties are racist but the entire white MSNBC lineup is not. Imaging if MSNBC was a right wing news organization? But then again if they were, Keith Obermann and his ilk would never be able to get a job with them so we would be talking about some other organization. Muslims commit acts of violence and they look the other way or make excuses for them. But say one bad thing about a Muslim and you are a racist. They are not the only ones on the left, but they are the most vocal and don’t even try to pretend some semblance of unbiased journalism anymore. Is it any wonder that MSNBC is last in ratings? Let’s not forget about the angry white men that attend a black president’s town hall meeting with guns, and then it turns out to be a black man with the guns supporting the angry white people. That is just flat out dishonest. And the person responsible for that outrage is still working there to this day. Things like that is the reason I hate MSNBC so much. Well that and Keith Obermann. Oh the rest of the leftist media makes me angry too, but nothing like MSNBC.

I am old enough now that I don’t have to worry about what I say. I have freedom of speech and I am going to use it as a free man should and I don’t care who I offend. There is no such thing as freedom from being offended. You want to take away my right to speak, and this includes Muslim extremist and anyone that believes in political correctness. Come and take it, you will have to kill me to shut me up.

Our homeland security chief keeps on saying the system works. Is the system relying on the incompetence of the terrorist? That is a pretty sad way to provide security for a country. I wonder how many innocent Americans have to die before this administration wakes up. How many people would be dead if the terrorist were more competent? According to the National review there have been more attempts on our country failed or impeded by law-enforcement just in the last year then the last 2 years or President Bush’s administration. Could it be they see this president as a weak man that will not do anything significant if a terrorist does kill innocent Americans? It is one possibility. One thing I do know about Arabs, having spent some time in the Middle East is they respect strength much more then weakness and will use our own weakness against us. Someone told me the extremist respect our military because they are strong but are amazed that the same society that produces our warriors produce people like Obama and the leftist media. I can see where they would be confused.

President Obama does not censor my speech, at least not yet, so yes I am calling these people Muslim extremist and terrorist. Unlike the newest national security report that sees returning Iraq and Afghanistan vets, and tea party people as a bigger threat then Muslim extremist, and never once mentioning who the real enemy is.

But I digress, I have come to the conclusion that either the people that we rely on everyday to make our personal decision in life are complete morons or they don’t want us to know what is going on overseas because it does not fit the narrative. The narrative being that the Muslim extremist are really nice people and that the people of America are so bad that we would take it out on every Muslim American we saw. Of course that didn’t happen after the first Trade center bombing in the 90′s, it didn’t happen after the USS Cole, it didn’t happen after 9/11, it didn’t happen after the DC sniper, it didn’t happen after the Fort Hood murders, it didn’t happen after the Christmas day bomber. You would think they would see the pattern, but they are blinded by their own ideology. I don’t think they are morons, except for most of the evening line up on MSNBC.

The truth is socialism is failing in Greece and they do not want us to know because for the last 30 years and especially since the love affair started between the MSM and Obama, how great socialism is. How much better America would be off with socialism. Now we see an entire country going down the tubes because of socialism and they are afraid that we will think the narrative they have been forcing on us for so long is wrong. Well those of us over 30 that are not complete idiots have seen that socialism has not worked in any country that it was applied and capitalism has worked for over 200 years are not going to change our minds just because it is fashionable to do so. They don’t have that kind of control over us. Reality is stronger the fantasy. For those that are under 30 and have swallowed the socialism Kool-Aid believe people like Michael Moore that Cuba has a vibrant economy. But to be fair, Cuba is not really a socialist country, it is more a communist dictatorship. The under 30 crowed just has not had enough life experiences to see the reality of it yet. I am not sure what the excuse is for people over 30 that buy into it. Maybe they are just tired of working for a living and want the government to give them everything regardless of what it will do to the country in future years.

The media and the left in general, which is most of the media and the administration, does not want us to see what America will be like in the future if socialism is allowed to progress on its current path here in America. Capitalism is a self generating system. It produces the wealth to keep it going. Socialism by its very nature cannot be sustained on its own. It needs a constant influx of money from the producers to give to the non-producers. Eventually the non-producers will grow past the point that the producers can support and the money will stop or slow to a trickle. What happens then when it gets so bad that the government cannot pay for the social programs the people who use to be self reliant, now rely on? The result is what is happening today in Greece. The people that are burning banks and murdering bankers are not the people handing out the special privileges; they are the people relying on the social programs to live. You can’t really blame them. Well yes you can, they are the ones that had their hands out to begin with. They are the people that allowed it to happen. They are the people that sucked dry their own economy without regard of the consequences.

The media is afraid we are going to realize that we are heading in that direction also. Guess what media, we knew that all along. The current administration and their cronies in congress are sucking dry this country. The difference between America and Greece is there are millions of us that will not let our country turn into another Greece. We will not be beholden to the EU or any other world government to bail us out when our country runs out of money. It is things like this that is what the tea parties and the patriot movement is all about. The left cannot find any logical arguments to counter our movement so they call us Racist where there is no sign of racism; they call us violent when there is no sign of violence. They have to degrade us or it makes them look like idiots. Guess what, it isn’t working and you still look like idiots. Like little kids who whine and complain when they don’t get their way. That is the way I see most liberals anyway, at least the ones in the media, Hollywood and Academia. The movement grows more and more regardless of the lies and will continue to grow and will only stop when the socialists, statists, and progressives no longer have the power.

Will America eventually end up like Greece? If we don’t stop the agenda of the statist it will, but not if we the people have anything to say about it. And that is what worries us the most that we don’t have anything to say about it. Then it will be time to take matters into our own hands but only as a last resort and I pray to god every day that it never comes to that because it will not be a second American revolution, it will be a second civil war.

But what if they did, what are militias all about? You have already seen what MSNBC and others in the left stream media think of militias. Are they just giving bad press to an entire group because of some bad apples, or are they right about the American militia movement?

To honestly answer that question you have to forget all that you have heard from the media about militias, especially from the left but the right media is almost as responsible for misrepresentation of the militias and do your own research. Let’s start with what a militia actually is. I know the history of the militia from the revolutionary war is one of the reasons we won our freedoms but there is more to it than that. First of all, unorganized militias are legal according the U.s. Code which is the law of the land. TITLE 10 > Subtitle A > PART I > CHAPTER 13 > subsection 311 talks about the composition and classes of the militia. Section (a) states The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard. The classes of militias are: the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia. According to this, the unorganized militia is any able-bodied male over the age of 17 that is not part of the Armed forces or the National Guard. Now this law is not enforced. If it was every male under the age of 45 not part of a militia would be put in jail or fined. This law also blows out of the water the argument that right to bear arms is only for the militia since every male over the age of 17 is part of the militia.

This law does have a section for exemptions. Subsection 312 states: (a) the following persons are exempt from militia duty:

(1) The Vice President.

(2) The judicial and executive officers of the United States, the several States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Virgin Islands.

(3) Members of the armed forces, except members who are not on active duty.

(4) Customhouse clerks.

(5) Persons employed by the United States in the transmission of mail.

(6) Workmen employed in armories, arsenals, and naval shipyards of the United States.

(7) Pilots on navigable waters.

(8) Mariners in the sea service of a citizen of, or a merchant in, the United States.

(b) A person who claims exemption because of religious belief is exempt from militia duty in a combatant capacity, if the conscientious holding of that belief is established under such regulations as the President may prescribe. However, such a person is not exempt from militia duty that the President determines to be noncombatant.

The exemptions do not include anyone because of political beliefs. So in reality, everyone on the left and right that is not part of the Military or National Guard or can claim an exemption according to subsection 312 is breaking the law. Personally I think that people that are on the right have a better mindset to be part of a militia. I really don’t want someone defending me that refuses to fire a gun or is willing to starve after weeks in the field because they refuse to eat meat. This is the law that gives the government the right to have the draft. In reality, every able bodied male that is a citizen of the United States is part of the unorganized militia whether they like it or not. So the real truth is, the members of the unorganized militias are the only ones not breaking the law.

That changes however when a group starts talking about overthrowing the government or about killing police or other Americans. At that point they are no longer a militia. They are a Para-military terrorist group. And most militia men would be willing to fight that group. The problem is the media likes to bunch all the militias around the country as Para-military terrorist groups. They can’t or refuse to tell the difference between a Para-military terrorist group and the militia. Talk about profiling, they are profiling millions of Americans, but it is ok because the left is usually wrong about anything that has to do with war or the military. If the charges are true then the Michigan Militia is a Par-military terrorist group and not a real militia. Any group can call themselves a militia until they break the law, then they are no longer a militia. Real militia are just like the National Guard, to protect and defend the constitution of the United States, the constitution or their respective states and to protect and defend their local communities in the event the National Guard and police are overwhelmed and not able to protect everyone and they do it within the confines of the law. Not just in time of war but during national disasters also like floods, and snow storms, as well as time when a lost child needs to be found and they need as many people on the search as possible. The militias want to be prepared for such events and that is what scares people. That the events they prepare for are not only national disasters but war. Someday it may come to the homeland. And if you think that will never happen you are only fooling yourself. Most people do not know that during WWII the Japanese actually did attack Alaska and it was the state unorganized militia that was later organized that fought them off.

In my quest for the truth, I have contacted some militias, not nationwide but here in my home state. There is more militia groups in any one state then people think there are. I have not joined any militia group, yet, or been to any meetings or trainings and I have not met anyone in person. I have talked to some individuals over the phone and the internet and on some web sites. Without exception I thought I was talking to a member of our regular military. Most are former military (thank god) and some are not. But they all told me the same thing. They are not anti-government, they believe in the American system of government albeit the government set up and intended by the founding fathers not a socialist government and they believe their job is to protect and defend the constitution from all enemies of the U.S. They believe just like any military unit they must be prepared for anything, even war if it comes down to it.

They not only train in weapons, but they also train in things like life saving, CPR, they have drills for search and rescue in case they are needed. One of the members put it this way, a well trained militia is like car insurance, it is something that is necessary, and it is required by law but it is also something you hope you never have to use. No real militia man wants to take up arms against their own country or have to fire on a fellow American. Anyone who professes anti-government or taking up arms against the government or fighting law enforcement is immediately kicked out and the groups use their contacts in other groups to make sure that individual does not join another militia. In some extreme cases where the members think this individual is a danger to the community he is turned into law enforcement. At that point it is up to the government to deal with the individual.

Training a well regulated and well disciplined militia is the key to having a backup plan in the event Americans armed forces and law-enforcement agencies are overwhelmed and need help. Just because the militia has not been needed by the government since WWII does not mean it will not be needed in the future. It seems to me that militia as they are intended to be are to assist the military, first responders and law-enforcement when needed. There are thousands of unorganized militias around the country, and grouping all of them as right wing extremist groups is the same thing as saying that all liberals are left wing extremist, Marxist and communist. Are there militia groups that are extremist that do not go along with the spirit of the militia, yes there are most likely. And the legitimate militias are doing their best to rid the militia community of these groups as best they can, but as long as the media portrays all militia groups as extremist right wingers (there are liberal that love their country and are part of militia also), that want to overthrow the government, Americas perception of the militia movement will not change.

There are some people that would say, if our military was overwhelmed the U.N. would step into help. Ask yourself this, who would you trust the most, a U.N. solider probably not from this country that has no interest in the American people or American freedom or a free American that is defending his home, family and country? I would go with the American every time. However the government may need the U.N. to come in and help because the military and law-enforcement would be overwhelmed if President Obama tries to put through the U.N. treaty to ban all gun because the treaty would overwrite the constitution. I don’t think there would be many Americans happy with that treaty or would there be many that would comply like the sheep in England and Australia did. There would be some, but many would resist, especially coming from the U.N. As far as I am concerned, they should bulldoze the UN building in New York, stop all funding and kick all UN officials out of the country. Just stopping all the funding would cause the UN to go under. The U.S. is the largest donator to the U.N.

Most militia members are individuals that are independent and believe that it is every person’s responsibility to take care of them. Self-reliance is a big part of what a militia man believes. Maybe that is why there is such a big push in government today to do away with the militia. Everyone knows there are some socialist in power, if you don’t know you are not paying attention. A socialist does not want people to be self-reliant. They want people to rely on the government for more and more. That gives the government more control, more power and a constant stream of votes. A self-reliant person does not need the government therefore cannot be controlled and is not a sure vote.

What makes you so afraid of the militia other then the misinformation from the left-stream media? Is it the fact that there are armed men running around the countryside with guns? Those guns are there to protect you and your liberties. Is it that you are afraid that the militias might try to overthrow the government? Ask yourself this question, what is more likely, that an attempt to overthrow the government will come from left-wing hate America socialist groups or from pro-American love of country right wing groups.

The media tries to use the Tim McVeigh and the Oklahoma City bombing as a reason for the danger of militia groups. They say he was part of a militia group. The truth is he tried to join the several militia groups and was denied membership. Even the government said he acted alone; at least it is their claim. Do you think if he was part of a militia group that the Clinton administration and the rest of the left-stream media would have for a second not given the militia group credit for the bombing. If there was a group that helped him it would have come from overseas, more likely from the Middle East. He did not represent any militia group in America. If any group if any of the legitimate militia groups would have gotten wind of what he was planning to do they would have turned him in. Whether the government would have listened to a militia group is another story for another time. Militia groups exist to protect the people, not to harm them.

There are four kinds of people, the sheep, the wolves, the sheepdogs and the sheepdogs among the sheep. The sheepdogs on the outside of the flock would be our military and law-enforcement, protecting the flock from the wolves. The sheepdogs among the sheep would be the militia to protect the sheep from any of the wolves that get past the sheepdogs on the outside of the flock. You would have different sheepdogs in different areas of the flock to protect those areas because the sheepdog on the outside cannot protect every area all the time.

For a long time, the sheepdogs among the flocks have not been needed because the sheepdogs on the outside have done such a great job. But isn’t it better to know there are trained people out there that are willing to step up if ever the wolves do get past the outside sheepdogs? They are the ones you can count on when they are needed. Not the left wing good for nothing but talk media. If I had to rely on a media type that is only willing to talk to defend my freedom and a militia man that is willing to die to defend my freedom, I would go with the militia man every time.

Personally, if I knew of any militia group that was trying to overthrow the government, blow up any buildings or cause harm to the police or any other group of Americans on the left or right of the political spectrum, I would turn them in myself and do so with pride. Especially groups from outside the country that just want to hurt American and that include any religious groups like Muslim extremist. Anyone who has read my blogs understands I detest political correctness and I don’t give a crap about President Obama’s censorship of the federal government concerning Islam, or Islamic extremist or war on terror. It would also give me a lot of glee if it was a leftist environmental extremist group that likes to cause property damage in the name of the environment.

It can be destroyed by a simple vote in November!